Superiority
 

Hey I'd like to discuss the superiority of the black male over whites in all categories.

Thank you, Mustang...

Why is it stupid?

Black men are larger, stronger, faster, and better hung than white men, not to mention their overall bull nature. White men simply don't have that making white women crave them

Yeah, but........
 

Yeah, but Jewish men have higher IQs and are better providers.

Forget money I'm talking about basic primal stuff. There are still a lot of smart black people though.

Yeah but what?
 

Oh yes, please, let's have more sweeping generalizations thrown around. I think that Mustang's original response to the OP might have been meant to point out that threads like this have no merit, and just drag the entire site down. Inevitably people tend to see these threads as their own opportunity to counter the idiotic, racial stereotypes with pointed and potentially insulting generalizations of their own.

Crazy, your intentions may not have been to insult anybody... But grow up.

Horny, I'm sure you've got a few scientific studies on human intellect, broken down by race, in your back pocket (keep in mind that most modern geneticists don't even believe that there is more than one human "race")... But my college educated siblings and I, driving around our Mercedes, Audis and Infinitis, beg to differ with the core of your assertions.

Some facts
 

As far as cock size I cannot find any studies that confirm black men in general have bigger cock than white men. Those black men who do have bigger than average cock are the ones wo m are themselves available to white women and may also have a career in porn. The white men who have small dick that have smaller than average cock have somehow been convinced they cannot satisfy their wives sexually and therefore they are not reel men and become submissive cock-sucking cuckolds. Every article I read that did actual studies said the male penis measures between 5.6" to 6.2" in in length. Race was not a factor as men from all ages were measured. So guys from some balls and if you're really small learn how to eat pussy and finger fuck your woman stimulating her g-spot. My cock is about 6 3/4" long and have made many women scream in orgasm. If you want to allow your wife to experience a BBC then go for it. But self proclaimed whimsy cuck get over it. Participate when your lady is getting fucked
Don't just sit in a chair jerk in off like you inferior because you're not!

I don't think this thread is stupid at all.

Haha ya fcking kidding me right?
 

When ya strip it all down.
 

You basically think of blk men as animals who can perform. :rolleyes:

I honestly hate it when people try and trash one group to empower another. All for a fantasy IR fantasy game.

You shouldn't let yourself fall into that way of thinking oh and YA NEVER JUDGE A BOOK BY IT'S COVER!!! Ever!! So stop grouping races!!

That last paragraph is somewhat stereotyping. Regardless of race you will find those that are more muscular than others, either because, as you say, the work they do, or because they choose to exercise or not. Of course, genetics plays a role too, but physical training with a proper diet and other supplements can improve on that also. I know this from personal experience, not only in my travels while in the military, but because there were times when I forced myself to be something that I am not and was quite bulked up and muscular, which is not my normal body frame.

Given the nature of this website this thread seems to be part of it's bread and butter actually, though it would be far less offensive to call it difference in the races rather than superiority, though clearly difference lends itself to different strengths and weaknesses.

To call it all lifestyle is only half true, the nature side of the nurture argument is pretty enormous, different types of muscle, fat mass, bone density, bone shapes and sizes (everything from cranial structure, teeth, jaws, finger length etc), skin thickness, melanin (obviously) different susceptibility to different illnesses, testosterone levels, bone shapes, brain volume, proportions of different areas of the brain, maturation rates, are different in the races in a way that you can categorise.

"(keep in mind that most modern geneticists don't even believe that there is more than one human "race") I really think that in itself is an overly politically correct generalisation. There is no consensus on that it's just the most politically watered down version of it, in the scientific community there are many theories. Alot of the scientific research on the difference in races was actually far too controversial and so much, though not all stopped.

As for the IQ studies one can debate that and it is particularly controversial. Though oddly enough people seem less offended by the fairly widely recorded findings that asian folks tend to be a few IQ points higher than caucasians, regardless of economic or social status. I suspect it's a difference in intelligence rather than superiority, but the idea that people evolving in wholly different environments did not end up with consistent differences in their physicality seems more odd. I can't imagine that Africa, Europe, Asia etc has the same demands on an organism evolving in it, but at the same time I can't imagine any superior to any other either, they would all be demanding.

It is a very potentially offensive topic, but then again it's a shame people can't honestly talk about difference in their entirety to appreciate it in a balanced view, and it works both ways. While people may bat around IQ studies for intellectual superiority, people throw around black athletic superiority on the other side just as frequently due to excelling at basketball, football etc given explosive movements fit the fast twitch muscles of black folks better, but other types of exercise and sport tend to be fairly uniformly distributed among the races in reality, look at the olympics.

Uhm, yeah... But since a lot of us are "mutts"?
 

Here's the long answer... I've actually studied much of this, in college and in my professional life.

I actually agree with some of what you've said, though I'm not onboard with your perspective on this particular thread. Discussions about the differences inherent within the respective "races" is not something I'd discourage... Assuming that intellectual conversation was not broached specifically based on (as stated by the OP) the general "superiority" of one race (even my own) over another. That is not a discussion of genetic variation, based on familial heredity or environmental influences -- that's just race-baiting.

On another point... Just because you can point out general (mostly esthetic) distinctions between people based on their "race", that does not exclude the idea that there really is only one race of human on this planet (personally I believe that the distinction of "race" is better applied to distinguish us from other hominids, like Neanderthals). After all, the differences you mentioned can be found in individuals within the same immediate family. Remember that more than 10% of relationships in the US are interracial. So distinctions based on "pure race labels" are less and less relevant these days.

One last thing genetic note -- and this is a fact by the way. If you compare the genetic differences between a white [native] man from Norway, with that of a man from deepest, darkest Africa, you would be surprised at just how insignificant those differences actually are. In fact, studies have shown that two chimps, from the same family group, will actually show LESS genetic variation. That is why the concept of "race" is questioned, from a genetic perspective. According to the very technology that lead us to be able to amplify DNA (as with the PCR process), and to track mitochondrial DNA down through the ages, we are all basically one big family.

Superiority
 

Amen to that Mustang. And to the poster, ever hear about Big John Holmes. He was anything but black buddy and larger than most ever could be. I agree with Mustang, this is a stupid thread.

Hostmaster, you got some banhammers to drop again
 

this is clearly shitposting

What a sensible answer thankyou, I was only half playing the devil's advocate discussing it in this thread given how much neurotic fantasizing goes on in these forums. That said though if you don't believe in race why would you come to a forum that fetishes it? Flaunting all the uni degrees and professional success don't counteract the fact you're in a forum that celebrates the white woman-black man culture that's built on unhealthy inclinations that even if only in unconscious sexual expression still reeks of supremacy, culturally it plays out black men as walking dildos for white woman, or white men as disposable worker drones for a woman's bank balance. Alot of swagtastic black douchebags or sexually repressed white men, play up to cause it gives them a sense of potency and virlity even though ultimately it's dehumanizing. I've seen very little celebration in this forum of what I would consider myself to be proud of in black culture, it's not celebrating that, or white for that matter, but more a whole lot of confused and heartless lust, hence my post in the 'verified' section where effectively people sprinkle some weak assed 'authenticity' sparkly dust over a foundation of shit.

I've asked people this before in the 'interracial' scene and I come across alot of cognitive dissonance, people hanging around in specifically racially fetishised places, be it forums or virtual worlds and then denying any difference in race, almost parrot talking out alot of liberal culture that denies race whilst simultaneously fetishising it, especially black folk who via the rap industry and various mandingo stereotypes fills a sort of patholigically violent representation of masculinity in an otherwise zealously feminist culture (I'm not anti-feminist just anti-bad feminists who go on and on about the 'patriarchy' and the ills of men.)

I won't nitpick the ''facts' you speak of though if you have studied it so indepth you would be aware that there is a varied divergence of opinion. That said you have valid arguments, i'm assuming you meant that chimps genetic variation within a family has MORE difference than humans of different racial backgrounds, though that really doesn't counteract the fact that chimps are distinctly chimps, for all the variation in the world no chimp gets born looking like a gorilla, orangutan or bonobo. They say chimps and humans share 98% of the same DNA, so for all the similarity between the racial DNA clearly a small amount can make a fair difference. I agree on the evolutionary tree all of the races branch out from homo sapiens, the difference is not as much as monkeys and gorillas, but it would follow a loosely defined branching out that would be distinct (I know the 8.4% of interracial relationships in america waters it down but in the rest of the world it's a bit more distinct.) I imagine it is extremely hard to distinctly define races given the huge diversity but it gets much easier when you take the truth that every creature evolves intimately with their unique environment. I think we agree in the sense we should talk of ancestry rather than race as it is easier to pin down biology to location, but this still points to trends of similarity and difference of peoples that evolved in the same location of ecosystem.

Some findings for example:
''Dr. Williamson’s group reported that a version of a gene called DAB1 had become universal in Chinese but not in other populations. DAB1 is involved in organizing the layers of cells in the cerebral cortex, the site of higher cognitive functions.''

''David Reich, a population geneticist at the Harvard Medical School, said that the term “race” was scientifically inexact and that he preferred “ancestry.” Genetic tests of ancestry are now so precise, he said, that they can identify not just Europeans but can distinguish between northern and southern Europeans. Ancestry tests are used in trying to identify genes for disease risk by comparing patients with healthy people. People of different races are excluded in such studies. Their genetic differences would obscure the genetic difference between patients and unaffected people. ''

''There are medicines prescribed every day in America targeted at specific racial groups, such as hypertension drug BiDil.
When BiDil was given the nod in 2005, the FDA’s Robert Temple stated plainly: “The information presented to the FDA clearly showed that blacks suffering from heart failure will now have an additional safe and effective option for treating their condition.”

Now there are deep ethical questions to all this but already that's a good example of there not being this great consensus you speak of, Harvard and the FDA are hardly racists on the fringes of society, whether they are ethical is up for debate but clearly they are reacting to some scientific evidence. The chinese free of the political correctness of the west are doing lots of research into it. I could go on, I just cherry picked some ones that stuck out.

I personally believe the huge taboo around this subject is more a cultural one than a scientific one, as I said previously people are not as averse to differences in asians, whites, for some obvious historical reasons it is most edgy when the spectrum is narrowed to whites and blacks (I really wish they would change the name to the continental origin for one rather than have this oppositional white/ black dynamic but rather european and african). Also these days while there is still white racism, the prevalence of black racism is given a cultural free pass as though it's not actually racism when by normal standards it is, comedians, rappers, even 'experts' invited onto debate shows to talk about race. I find it infuriating because a significant section of 'our' black culture seems to hog the talk on race and have the loudest voice, it puts us into an overly victimised marxist ideology that doesn't get to all the truth, one being our own responsibility for certain fucked up areas of our own culture, but perhaps more importantly it's a little arrogant to trump black suffering over the suffering of other races or ancestory.

It's precisely this cultural double standard that runs rampant in this very forum, and is probably a large part of the reason that drives the neurotic fetish, my opinion of which is increasingly that if you're aware of that it can be a useful, albeit limited
tool for catharsis to grow up out of the schizophrenic cultural trends around race, or you can just wire the racism even deeper, of which many of the most sexually charged fetish posts seem to.

I'm gonna tone down my aggressive language because it's wasted here but much in this forum doesn't seem the least bit healthy, or have intelligence with regards to sexuality, I suppose I have more patience for those just taking the piss or coming out with some creative outlandish sexual fetish because it's almost tongue in cheek, but when people pretend to get serious and say half assed waffle it just sounds dumber than a bucket of donkey dicks.

My point just flew right over your head...
 

I think you missed one of my main points. The original premise of this thread wasn't about the subtle (and not so subtle) differences between races. The OP was trying to say that one race was "superior" to another. Those are two very different things. If you want to start your own thread in order to have the conversation that you want to have, be my guest. By trying to build a meaningful discussion, from the shit pile of the OP's original theory of supremacy, is just pointless.

I vote that we let this thread die.

Props for beating down a strawman, I think it's you who didn't get my point given that most of the threads on this forum match the sentiment in this post anyway, hence just switching the debate over to a new post would mean diddly squit, that and you don't actually seem to have a clear stand on whether you think race even exists or not let alone any of my salient points. I'm not the one who has to whine on every slightly weird posting here.

It is funny to watch a certain group who just have to chime in every now and then in efforts of keeping 'integrity' to the forum. For all intensive purposes it's a free for all fet-athon with the odd meet up and porn share. I can't believe you were popping out your degrees and professional swag in a forum like this, though I suppose you're not used to Harvard and the FDA coming to bitch slap your half assed arguments back down.

Huh?
 

FDA?... FDA???... Really? The Food and Drug Administration??? What the fuck are you even talking about? [in the voice Inigo Montoya] I don't think that means, what you think it means.

Here's a tip: When you're trying to pretend to be something you are not, you really need to do your homework. Otherwise you just end up looking stupid... Oh, and a few links to random crap on the internet does not impress anyone with more than two brain cells -- I can google too.

Still not sure why the suggestion to create a fresh thread upsets you so... You seem to get angry pretty easy? I think somebody needs a nap... Or just a hug... Or maybe both?

Why was I not invited?
 

Dude you guys are having a battle of intellect and you did not invite me. Seriously? First off wtf does the food and drug administration have to do with porn and the interracial lifestyle lol. You really should process all those thoughts that have incubated in the back of your mind before exercising those neurons buddy.

I can not speak for CaliBlk4U but personally, I chose to become educated and make something of myself rather than sit around with my pants sagging, a gun in my pocket, and drinking Hennessey while listening to gansta rap.

People like me and CaliBlk4U do not consider ourselves to be better than anyone but we do consider ourselves to be on a different level intellectually. Having a different level of intellect has nothing to do with race or sex, it just means that we process and respond to situations/actions differently than others because of rational thinking. With that being said, there is only a certain amount of ignorance that intelligent people can handle before they have to correct the person presenting the argument so when ignorant posts and comments start popping up all over the place we are going to correct it so that people can become enlightened.

Not only did you fail to correct the OP, CaliBlk4U, or myself as intended but you constructed this jargon of nonsense that does not even remotely resemble any form of dialect. I read it three times and it confused the hell out of me lol. That whole post was just a bunch of paragraphs with fancy words that where thrown together to make you look sophisticated. It takes more than big words to be intelligent and you just proved it lol.

I agree Mustang this is sets a new standard for stupid.

You left out smoking Newports..... Lol

Sorry, but I have to disagree with you. My very first post in this thread corrected the OP. Did you even read it?... It's short and the words are small enough for everyone to understand.

Idiomatic use (pun intended)
 

It's "for all intents and purposes."

You also may want to brush up on the concept of run-on sentences and the correct use of commas. I normally ignore grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors (considering the venue). However, when someone attempts to establish intellectual superiority over one of my friends, I just can't resist.

Lady

No no no. P