Is there any truth to the...
 

less attractive the better the sex mantra?
In looking back I can definitely state that I've had some of the best sex with women who weren't necessarily attractive.

That has been my experience also.

Same here. That has actually been my experience with many parts of life in addition to sex.

I find the hotter , the sexier the women the more I get into it. I just fuck a lot better and she responds to that . So for me the more attractive women the better the sex.

What is attractiveness?
Physical beauty, emotional quotient, intellect, etc please define.
I suppose a new thread could be started to ask the question, is it true that the more physically unattractive, uneducated and emotionally unavailable—the better the sex? Hmmmmm

There is absolute truth to that. I had a short fatty whose stomach you could hold on to when doing doggie! She didn't care, she wanted the dick. She also had no hesitation about licking and fingering my ass. Would also ask if she could be pissed on. There was nothing she would not do.

I think you're reading a wee bit too much on to the post.
Attractiveness is subjective and is in the eyes of the beholder right? I can only speak for myself and what I like and what I prefer is a fat ass & juicy thighs. Have I had sex with females that don't have a fat ass & juicy thighs? YES!
I prefer natural beauty, you know without all the layers of makeup. Like Bria Myles, Meagan Good, Angela Bassett, Lupita Nyongo, etc. Have I had sex with females that don't look like them? Of course!
I put females in to a friendly, sexually or monogamy and since I'm single most of my female relationships fall under the category of either friendly or sexually. If I'm in a sexual relationship; physical attraction takes a back seat to sexual skills; education takes a back seat to sexual skills; emotional availability takes a back seat to sexual skills. I have women who are educated and uneducated; I have women who are physically attractive and unattractive; I have women who are emotionally unavailable and available. So whether one has or lacks those qualities it doesn't phase me.
I've had sex with quite a few women who I would consider "physically unattractive". Some of it was good and some was horrible (in the beginning).
Physical unattractive people have sex all the time; look at this site; look at other sites; look at your friends who are married or single and still fucking.
I've had sex with "educated" women who didn't know how to clean themselves properly; I've had sex with "educated" women who were broke and struggling and in debt and the sex was good.
I've had sex with females who were in business for themselves and doing quite well, monetarily and some that had regular jobs. Sometimes it was good and other times it was bad.
The only thing that matters in a sexual relationship are the actual SEXUAL SKILLS! Nothing more and nothing less. Anything over and beyond that is a perk.
You think these young good looking women that are in relationships with hideous looking rich men; are in it for love of or are physically attracted to or are educated or are emotionally available? NO! it's strictly for money.
You think a handsome man that has sex with a hideous looking women is in it for the physical attraction? NO! That's strictly for gratification.
I don't know what personal attributes or personal gains a female may have nor do I seek out any other than the physical aspects but I think a lot of people, more so women, have a hard time grasping with the realities of personal relationships; they want to make it out to be something other than what it is.