04-24-2013, 08:32 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 36
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbrowski
I think the difference is you think "fat" girls with fat asses are fat, and I think "fat" girls with flat asses are fat, but if you look at it scientifically, and technically, all of them would be considered fat. If a female was of average weight with no ass or thighs, according to society, which is usually from a white mans perspective, she would be considered petite. If a women has ass and thighs, then she's considered to be fat, or bbw, or voluptuous. I know females that weigh 10-20-30-40 pounds more than me (190lbs), but they have flat stomachs; the weight is on their thighs, and ass, but it just so happens that's exactly what I like.
It's just a subjective matter of how much is considered "thick".
I remember back in the day "thick" meant having tits, ass, and thighs, and along the years it just came down to thighs and ass.
I prefer my ladies to have meat on their body and to be soft so I have something to squeeze and hold on to. If I have to hug a female with a hard body it just wouldn't feel right.
The females attached are examples of "fat" girls with fat asses (depth).
|
I wanna meet some white chicks like that!
|
Linear Mode
