Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtygirl
1)like u said not everyone on here is looking for bbc or white only
2) Interracial is of mixed races not black or white only
3) i may not write as eloquently as you but the point i was trying to make is that we should not base assumptions on colour, race etc which is what i only hear lately - that is racially prejudice
4) Dont assume that i am white - im far from white actually im probably darker than you.
5) Above all - all pussys are pink 
|
Actually, I wondered whether you were white or not (because of other posts you have made). But, ultimately it's not important. That's because of course, as you note, interracial is more than black and white (who said it wasn't, and I like brown Latinas remember?). I see you got my point. Other than speaking as if you were white (for the sake of argument more than anything else), I didn't assume anything. Your post was obviously in response to my post stating that I liked Latinas and didn't care if I never had sex with another
white woman ever again (thus my choice to refer to a "white female" in my response . . . and not necessarily and specifically to you per se . . . as
you assumed

).
Now I ask, what negative "assumptions" did I make with that statement about somebody's race? That I like Latinas and don't care if I sleep with another white woman again? I made a statement based on my personal experience (already had sex with a
lot of white women), what I like, and what my personal preferences are at this stage of my life, without making any "racist assumptions" about anybody else whatsoever. But then you turned around and insinuated that what I said was in fact "racist". Whether you intended it or not, that's certainly the way what you wrote came across to me. So, I tried to show how it was not racism. Now you've used the term "racially prejudice" (sic) versus what you said before, which was "racist".
You know, it's not eloquence that makes for a good argument. It's substance. Eloquence certainly helps (as does good grammar and punctuation), but far more important is logic, reason, forethought, consistency, organization, passion, compassion, and real word experience. That and more = the substance of a good argument. That's a formula that tends to work a lot better and be much more effective than just shooting off at the mouth all the time without really thinking it through first. As does not focusing so much on trying to be "right" all the time, but rather on trying to reach the "right conclusions". There is a difference.