If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||
![]() The BSers, fakes, and pretenders tend to avoid threads that turn to serious debate and facts, methinks. The big dick stuff has always been male, they have driven it in porn and whatnot since long before the internet. Even the girls in porn do not want big. As an example, you can go to Asia Carrera's website to her FAQ and find...
"Some of the guys do have monster weenies, but most of them are around 6-7 inches. It's more important to have a reliable dick than a big one, as proven by Randy West. I personally hate big dicks, and I won't work with anyone 8 or more inches if I can help it. Most of the girls in our business agree, when shooting a long sex scene or more than one scene in a day, smaller is definitely better! You can reach my G-spot just fine with your finger, so anything else is redundant! " Source URL neutralized below: www (dot) asiacarrera (dot) com/faqs.html Many guys, I think, tend to look at a hole as a "how many can we squeeze into a phone booth" type challenge... the girls sometimes go along with it, especially if paid. But in the fallacy bubble of this site and a few others, some actually promulgate garbage like "white girls in porn actually do IR scenes with black guys free." Such BS gets harder and harder to stomach. Dick size crap has a long history. Here is a somewhat fun old thread to read -- http://www.iloveinterracial.com/foru...mpetition.html At least years ago, the scraps were just a tad more balanced and easier to read. These days, there are just so many fakes and pretenders proselytizing nonsense, penile-racial-politics, and the absurd idea that white women are all flocking to black men and that all black men have big dicks and white guys have little dicks, and etc.,, that it drives people away. Many white guys that are "sharing" in this altered swinger type play get seriously annoyed at the attitudes and arrogance and stop playing. They and their GF/Wife pull the plug on this stuff that already had too many hassles anyway. Something about looking gift horses in the mouth comes to mind. What you are left with then.... well, I leave that to others to figure out for themselves. Many in this site now certainly do not like or accept facts from outside the bubble, that is certain. For instance, here is a study from UCLA (URL neutralized, and do not precede with WWW) - paa2008 (dot) princeton (dot) edu/papers/80046 Some quotes from that study: They are also more likely to prefer to date whites only; among those with an expressed preference, approximately 64% of white women prefer whites only compared to only about 29% of white men. Accordingly, white women are more likely then white men to exclude certain racial groups from dating consideration. Indeed, over 90% of white women who state a racial preference prefer not to date East Indians, Middle Easterners, Asians, and blacks. Consistent with the descriptive results, white women are also significantly more likely than white men to prefer to date whites only. Regardless of controls, white women are over four times as likely to prefer to date only whites as are white men. These findings reinforce that white males are more open to interracial dating in general than white females are. Body type, political views, and religion are also related to the exclusion of blacks or Asians. Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large. Finally, religion affects black exclusion, and Asian exclusion among white women. Specifically, we see that whites who identified as Jewish were dropped from the analysis of black exclusion because it was a perfect predictor; that is, all white men and women who identified as Jewish excluded blacks as possible dates; all white women who identified as Jewish also excluded Asian men as possible dates. ...Our finding that white women who do not fit conventional norms of beauty (i.e. those who are not thin or athletic-looking) are much more likely to include black men as possible dates than other white women is consistent with the notion that cultural ideals about beauty shape racial preferences. Much research has shown that, in dating and marriage markets, physical attractiveness is a more valued trait for women than men (Stewart, Stinnet and Rosenfeld 2000). Therefore, an openness to dating black men among these white women may actually reflect their knowledge that they do not fit the conventional beauty standards that appeal to white men. There is also another survey I read recently that polled college women about dick and found that 45 out of 50 prefer girth over length. That fits with the fact that only about 20% of women can orgasm vaginally as opposed to clitoral stimulation. Will any of this information stop the fakes, pretenders, and belligerent politics, etc.? Pffftt, not. [co-authored by hub] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||
![]() man if woman knew anything about pussy control they could fuck asain men and be happy but lazy pussy runs the world... ive only been with one woman who could "milk" a dick... no matter the position... she said she read books since she was 15... and man... no1 got it like her.. its wasnt just a squeeze... she could manipulate it like a hand or mouth!!! crayz! she could work it without moving her hips....
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|